updates for 0.4.1 | MyFootballNow

updates for 0.4.1

Beta Chat

NOTICE: This league is using the BLEEDING EDGE game engine. For more information, click here.

Re: updates for 0.4.1 by WarEagle @ 2/28/2017 9:09 am Mr.Krazy wrote: https://mfn1.myfootballnow.com/gamecenter/view/6028#1084795 This isn't zone coverage but what happened to #41 here? Did he trip himself up? He should have been able to keep up with Abron considering his 97 speed. Looks like he just sits there until Abron flies past him before attempting to chase him down Goal Line D, so maybe he was playing press coverage (bump and run) and just got beat? Or maybe he wasn't familiar enough with the plays (off/def). Liked by blackflys
Re: updates for 0.4.1 by raymattison21 @ 2/28/2017 9:45 am WarEagle wrote: Mr.Krazy wrote: https://mfn1.myfootballnow.com/gamecenter/view/6028#1084795 This isn't zone coverage but what happened to #41 here? Did he trip himself up? He should have been able to keep up with Abron considering his 97 speed. Looks like he just sits there until Abron flies past him before attempting to chase him down Goal Line D, so maybe he was playing press coverage (bump and run) and just got beat? Or maybe he wasn't familiar enough with the plays (off/def). This goes back to real football rules within player assignments . In this game while in man coverage all guys play a "trail technique " .....when in reality that should be reserved for plays when the cover guy has clear help over the top. Hopefully his man skills are extremely low.....but I see no difference in the technical first steps of the DB no matter the skill....this is why there is little difference in having an elite 96 speed db with 99 man skill or a 62 speed db with 99 man skill, because they always play "trail technique " and are all beat if the throw is timed right
Re: updates for 0.4.1 by Beercloud @ 2/28/2017 11:56 am https://mfn1.myfootballnow.com/gamecenter/view/6038#1086679 Offensive Play: I Formation 3WR WR Post Defensive Play: Nickel 3-3-5 Cover 2 Man Under - Pass Key #38 was kinda sitting back in no mans land and reacting pretty late. 37 speed, 48 accel, 26 intel, 49 displ, 100 zone Is it cause of intel, displ or accel maybe? He seemed to get back in his zone alright. Just didn't do anything after that.
Re: updates for 0.4.1 by Tecra031 @ 3/01/2017 8:05 am I am noticing that the angle of attack for defenders is off. If the offensive player makes one cut, most of the time it is for a big gain. I think it needs to be looked at. Liked by Ares, blackflys
Re: updates for 0.4.1 by blackflys @ 3/01/2017 9:18 am Beercloud wrote: https://mfn1.myfootballnow.com/gamecenter/view/6038#1086679 Offensive Play: I Formation 3WR WR Post Defensive Play: Nickel 3-3-5 Cover 2 Man Under - Pass Key #38 was kinda sitting back in no mans land and reacting pretty late. 37 speed, 48 accel, 26 intel, 49 displ, 100 zone Is it cause of intel, displ or accel maybe? He seemed to get back in his zone alright. Just didn't do anything after that. 37 speed is all you need to know. cbs play a lot better against top wrs when they have close toi the same speed as the wr hes covering. Last edited 3/01/2017 2:19 pm
Re: updates for 0.4.1 by raymattison21 @ 3/01/2017 9:44 am https://mfn1.myfootballnow.com/gamecenter/view/6057#1090084 This was the first game that playing a wr at oline seemed to have a negative effect. Rookie wr Martin finally let one up, but why are these guys on this play running behind the qb ? The C looks to help but is out of position by then. My worse qb lit it up and only 3 receivers were targets all game. Well he has better accuracy . ...and the TE is slipping behind double coverage . ....man and zone. Luckily the qbs ignore them. Short zone still looks soft and it seems 17 speed and 54 pass rushfrom the inside is alot more effective then an elite speed rusher vs the tackles.
Re: updates for 0.4.1 by blackflys @ 3/01/2017 10:20 am raymattison21 wrote: https://mfn1.myfootballnow.com/gamecenter/view/6057#1090084 This was the first game that playing a wr at oline seemed to have a negative effect. Rookie wr Martin finally let one up, but why are these guys on this play running behind the qb ? The C looks to help but is out of position by then. My worse qb lit it up and only 3 receivers were targets all game. Well he has better accuracy . ...and the TE is slipping behind double coverage . ....man and zone. Luckily the qbs ignore them. Short zone still looks soft and it seems 17 speed and 54 pass rushfrom the inside is alot more effective then an elite speed rusher vs the tackles. these are the [re season sack leaders speed-strength namw pos team tack sacks hurries 76-45 Richard Young (DT) LAA 9 7 7 89-57 Matthew Vestal (MLB) BAL 9 7 10 96-97 James Rodriguez (DT) MIN 14 7 10 85-76 Antonio Sharp (DT) MIA 12 5 9 81-80 Scott Puente (DT) CAR 17 5 13 10-51 James Cartwright (DT) dal 11 5 3 100-60 Andrew Dees (LDE) GBY 5 5 2 100-79 Francis Hoffman (DT) GBY 11 5 8 100-68 Philip Harris (RDE) CIN 6 4 5 77-68 Nicholas Gearhart (DT) NYA 4 4 5 sacks are considerably better. Last edited 3/01/2017 3:27 pm Liked by Beercloud
Re: updates for 0.4.1 by raymattison21 @ 3/01/2017 11:42 am blackflys wrote: raymattison21 wrote: https://mfn1.myfootballnow.com/gamecenter/view/6057#1090084 This was the first game that playing a wr at oline seemed to have a negative effect. Rookie wr Martin finally let one up, but why are these guys on this play running behind the qb ? The C looks to help but is out of position by then. My worse qb lit it up and only 3 receivers were targets all game. Well he has better accuracy . ...and the TE is slipping behind double coverage . ....man and zone. Luckily the qbs ignore them. Short zone still looks soft and it seems 17 speed and 54 pass rushfrom the inside is alot more effective then an elite speed rusher vs the tackles. these are the [re season sack leaders speed-strength namw pos team tack sacks hurries 76-45 Richard Young (DT) LAA 9 7 7 89-57 Matthew Vestal (MLB) BAL 9 7 10 96-97 James Rodriguez (DT) MIN 14 7 10 85-76 Antonio Sharp (DT) MIA 12 5 9 81-80 Scott Puente (DT) CAR 17 5 13 10-51 James Cartwright (DT) dal 11 5 3 100-60 Andrew Dees (LDE) GBY 5 5 2 100-79 Francis Hoffman (DT) GBY 11 5 8 100-68 Philip Harris (RDE) CIN 6 4 5 77-68 Nicholas Gearhart (DT) NYA 4 4 5 sacks are considerably better. How about there pass rush ? Perhaps who they faced one on one? How about the QB ? The scheme ? My DT was picked up off FA to stop the run, but he leads my team in pass rushing with no pass rushing skill ? That is broke beyond belief . ..... Come on my rookie wr is one of my better pass blocking guards ? And my RB will play qb despite no accuracy or intelligence .
Re: updates for 0.4.1 by blackflys @ 3/01/2017 1:08 pm every sack has to do with personnel and situations. that is the whole meaning of the game. you said the best DL were garbage ratings and the list of top 10 sacks and as you can see its pretty solid list of the opposite. these are some of your false statements. seem to be at least one every post lbs step backwards and make there read cbs shouldent play press coverage unless they have help 50 strength and 15 speed lead league in sacks the qb you mention is not a rb. hes a qb with 86 accuracy. not a 65 speed rb with below 50 accuracy like you make it sound. hes a pure QB someone who thrashes the game in anyway every post deserves to get some feedback Last edited 3/01/2017 6:16 pm
Re: updates for 0.4.1 by blackflys @ 3/01/2017 1:40 pm its hard to take you serious sometimes. you say your trying to help the game but you use arguments that try and make you sound right. they all are off the wall or exaggerated. try and play the real players in their positions and you might see the game different your wr played 100 plays total and gave up 3 sacks and he played in the 2nd half vs subs. you dont have any guards on your roster. your qb who has no accuracy has 86 how can you give such an accurate analysis when yopur playing guys outta position .. you expect not to see a bunch of garbage stuff happen