jdavidbakr wrote:
blackflys wrote:
Is that how the draft is going to be for now on? Why are you changing it? There's nothing wrong with it.
The main reason is to make the players less certain of what you're getting, to get better players in later rounds.
If the consensus is that it makes the draft worse, I will take it out. So please give your honest feedback - if more people voice that they dislike it than like it then I'll take it back out after the draft and throw the idea away.
why wasn't volatility kept hidden then. that's what made drafting even more safe in the first place. just cause some didn't understand it doesn't mean showing it didn't have value. not adjusting or playing with player cloaking for three drafts would be waste imo. compiling that system with combine scores is the way to go.....not every body makes it to the combine ...so how do they know how fast or strong they really are. Tom Brady says he's faster now than when he was a rookie, so static ratings with solid scores is not the only way to go.
and remember a predisposition towards something will only give a bias result. honesty is not always the best. the best thing here is to allow for the parity th e NFL has. that is what cause excitement. not safe draft picks.
trading in to the top ten cause it's a lock for a good player in not an NFL common strategy. garnering 3 to 5th round picks is though. here that is not as viable
