Welcome to the new Beta version of the MyFootballNow website! Please note that while using the Beta website, some features may not work correctly and other features are not complete. Some elements, such as notifications and chat, may act strangely during the time that both versions of the site are available. If you need to return to the old version, click on the button below.
Return to old website
People who liked this post
Poll: Draft Obfuscation
League News/General Discussion
NOTICE: This league is using the BLEEDING EDGE game engine. For more information, click here.

Please take a moment to vote on how you feel about the draft obfuscation process:

Get rid of the obfuscation, but make rookies first camp movement more significant.
7
Obfuscate everything except static attributes (speed, strength, etc)
5
Hated it, please take it back to the way it was before and don't make any other changes.
2
Loved it, keep it how it was this season and don't try to alter it.
2
Only obfuscate volatility
2
Loved it, but give each team more scouting and make it private to the team.
2
Loved it, but give each team more scouting. Keep scouting info public.
jdavidbakr
Re: Poll: Draft Obfuscation
by jdavidbakr (Site Admin) @ 8/03/2017 9:19 am
If you wish to vote for a combination of options, please vote for the one that you want most and add a comment to the thread. If there is a popular alternative option I will make a new poll.
oukjweather
Re: Poll: Draft Obfuscation
by oukjweather @ 8/03/2017 9:38 am
I would be alright with only obfuscating volatility along with making rookie camp more significant. Looking at the NFL, I think you see much more first and secound round talent actually get playing time and involved in there careers than what the current system allows. Not to say that every player should do that, as there are obviously players who need time to further develop before making an impact on the field.
mwd65
Re: Poll: Draft Obfuscation
by mwd65 @ 8/03/2017 11:26 am
I would also be in favor of obfuscating only volatility.

I believe the obfuscation, in its current state, in simply too random. I'm not sure if adding more scouts would be the answer.
JCSwishMan33
Re: Poll: Draft Obfuscation
by JCSwishMan33 @ 8/03/2017 4:32 pm
- Keep statics visible (because those tend to be relatively easy measurables, even in the NFL)
- Obfuscate Volatility (because in the NFL, you never really know whether a guy's going to boom or bust, just a vague idea)
- Make Rookies' Camp movement more significant (because teams tend to find out a better picture of boom / bust in Camp)
- Some more available scouts... I'm torn whether they should be public or private, though. I'd like it to be where the team scouting gets a better report than the public report, but I'm not sure how that would be to code.
kicker10bog
Re: Poll: Draft Obfuscation
by kicker10bog @ 8/03/2017 5:53 pm
Obfuscate only volatility.

I think that's what I selected. Not sure though because it only has 1 vote and sounds like someone else also voted for it already.

It would also be good to make rookie camp more significant.
Last edited 8/03/2017 10:55 pm
setherick
Re: Poll: Draft Obfuscation
by setherick @ 8/03/2017 6:21 pm
Can I vote for two - better rookie camps and obfuscating everything but static attributes.
WarEagle
Re: Poll: Draft Obfuscation
by WarEagle @ 8/03/2017 10:01 pm
JCSwishMan33 wrote:

- Obfuscate Volatility (because in the NFL, you never really know whether a guy's going to boom or bust, just a vague idea)

Volatility doesn't tell you if a player will boom or bust.
JCSwishMan33
Re: Poll: Draft Obfuscation
by JCSwishMan33 @ 8/04/2017 7:17 am
WarEagle wrote:
Volatility doesn't tell you if a player will boom or bust.
The likelihood of boom / bust then...

Whoops.