Welcome to the new Beta version of the MyFootballNow website! Please note that while using the Beta website, some features may not work correctly and other features are not complete. Some elements, such as notifications and chat, may act strangely during the time that both versions of the site are available. If you need to return to the old version, click on the button below.
Return to old website
People who liked this post

After the results of the previous poll, I wanted to drill in on the following:

Obfuscate everything except static attributes, AND make rookie camp movement more significant
10
Only make rookie camp movement more significant
8
Remove obfuscation completely and go back to the way it was
2
Only obfuscate everything except static attributes
jdavidbakr
Re: Poll: Draft obfuscation part 2
by jdavidbakr (Site Admin) @ 8/08/2017 8:31 am
If I made the decision today I would choose to obfuscated only non-static attributes + make rookie TC movement more significant. Please vote and feel free to discuss.
Tecra031
Re: Poll: Draft obfuscation part 2
by Tecra031 @ 8/08/2017 5:42 pm
Why isn't the option that most people voted for in Poll 1 an option now? (Get rid of the obfuscation, but make rookies first camp movement more significant). Kind of weird to me that the most voted for option was removed from the equation. Basically negates Poll 1 to me.
$B$Dog$
Re: Poll: Draft obfuscation part 2
by $B$Dog$ @ 8/08/2017 5:51 pm
Tecra031 wrote:
Why isn't the option that most people voted for in Poll 1 an option now? (Get rid of the obfuscation, but make rookies first camp movement more significant). Kind of weird to me that the most voted for option was removed from the equation. Basically negates Poll 1 to me.

I believe that is the second option.
ibblacklavender02
Re: Poll: Draft obfuscation part 2
by ibblacklavender02 @ 8/08/2017 7:50 pm
I think the rookie TC movement should be more significant for later round draft picks only.....Not sure how hard it is but It could happen during year 2 not 1 as most late round picks tend to develop slowly.
Davesgang
Re: Poll: Draft obfuscation part 2
by Davesgang @ 8/08/2017 11:09 pm
I am voting for option one.
I'd like to see a little variation in static bars. Just because they combined at speed and strength doesn't mean they wont gain or lose some.

Also rookie development should be big and also take place over two or three seasons. Have big future scores swings that might never come true.