People who liked this post
Spoilers

  • MFN-1
    • League Home
    • Power Rankings
    • Hall of Champions
  • League Forums
  • Players
    • Search
    • Draft History
    • Trades
  • Coaches
    • Search

  • Community
  • Log In
Rule Question
League Help Forum
NOTICE: This league is using the BLEEDING EDGE game engine. For more information, click here.
WarEagle
Rule Question
by WarEagle @ 12/16/2017 8:38 am
I am curious if something is possible, and if so...how?

This is related to Defensive rules.

I know I can have a rule so that against a specific personnel set I will call plays:
- from the Nickel formation
or
- from the Nickel AND blitz 1 LB
or
- from the Nickel AND blitz 1 LB AND have DBs in Man

I could also do the same from other formations (such as Dime)

However, is there a way for me to have a rule (or rules) so that in specific situations I will call plays:

(from the Nickel AND blitz 1 LB AND have DBs in Man) OR (from the DIME AND LB zone AND DB blitz 1)
I don't want Nickel plays called that are LB zone or DB blitz 1, etc.

I am looking for a way to accomplish this without having to remove all Nickel plays that aren't LB blitz 1 and DB man, as well as removing all Dime plays that aren't LB zone and DB blitz 1.

Thanks
jdavidbakr
Re: Rule Question
by jdavidbakr (Site Admin) @ 12/16/2017 9:23 am
That would have worked previously when all the rules were combined - you could have made two separate rules - but I don't think that's possible now since it uses the first rule in the list and there's not a 'or' logic on the result.
setherick
Re: Rule Question
by setherick @ 12/16/2017 10:57 am
jdavidbakr wrote:
That would have worked previously when all the rules were combined - you could have made two separate rules - but I don't think that's possible now since it uses the first rule in the list and there's not a 'or' logic on the result.

It's not possible at all because of what JDB is saying. I've tried to create rules that use AND logic to substitute for OR logic, and it becomes a jumbled mess as well.
WarEagle
Re: Rule Question
by WarEagle @ 12/16/2017 2:08 pm
That's what I feared. Oh well.

Thanks.
setherick
Re: Rule Question
by setherick @ 12/16/2017 2:16 pm
WarEagle wrote:
That's what I feared. Oh well.

Thanks.

Rule build is pretty ridiculous. What I want to be able to do is create rules that say in X situation call Y plays, and then set my run / pass percentages for just those plays.
Liked by WarEagle
Copyright ©2013-2026 Catalyst Productions | Weather data powered by Visual Crossing
Game Engine Version Bleeding Beta | Website Version fcff32e
Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy