![]() Re: [0.4.6] Version 85f6023a
by
raymattison21
@
6/25/2020 6:00 am
11 blocks vs. a 60 timing younger punter
|
|
![]() Re: [0.4.6] Version 85f6023a
by
TarquinTheDark
@
6/25/2020 10:06 am
2 for
CB Charles McGlothlin
from RT.
Lined up opposite FB Richard Mattie , who spins. Should have got help from RG/LS William Abner , who also spins. Punter Rickey Gagne has 77 timing.
Last edited 6/25/2020 3:06 pm
|
|
![]() Re: [0.4.6] Version 85f6023a
by
raymattison21
@
6/30/2020 6:19 pm
|
|
![]() Re: [0.4.6] Version 85f6023a
by
TheAdmiral
@
7/01/2020 10:00 am
raymattison21 wrote: https://mfn1.myfootballnow.com/watch/11641#2170942 2 yard QB scramble here..... Happens occasionally on the PA rollout, if all receivers are covered. Play is real boom bust, big pass play or sacked are the two usual results. One of my Coaches in Roster only loves this play, great when it works otherwise rubbish |
|
![]() Re: [0.4.6] Version 85f6023a
by
raymattison21
@
7/01/2020 4:07 pm
TheAdmiral wrote: raymattison21 wrote: https://mfn1.myfootballnow.com/watch/11641#2170942 2 yard QB scramble here..... Happens occasionally on the PA rollout, if all receivers are covered. Play is real boom bust, big pass play or sacked are the two usual results. One of my Coaches in Roster only loves this play, great when it works otherwise rubbish Yeah this one was a blitz vs heavy pass protection and with a slower QB. 4.6 is different I looked a waggle when Tark posted some runs but it was hard for my team to replicate, but it’s been awhile |
|
|
|
![]() Re: [0.4.6] Version 85f6023a
by
raymattison21
@
7/02/2020 6:26 am
https://mfn1.myfootballnow.com/box/11646
Yeah, a bit more work is needed ...... 17 sacks from one play and a punt blocked vs a 100 timing punter. The block was late in the game ....perhaps the punters leg was tired from kicking so much! Jokes aside, my lower rated punter steered clear of any blocks,but his guys were close often. Talking about hot fixes...the punt seems a bit better but pass blocking is broke... probably even worse and needs a fix. I will blame it on the speed gaps/ who blocks who...some have thoeries as well, but 17 sacks is too many. Really, the 4-6 heavy front has aligment issues somewhere that confuses the who to block recognition...seth might have more accurate info, but this is now the primary focus of my testing. Big game up next and i will do little else to prepare, but what will my opponent do ? Knowing i will be doing this....an all play overuse penalty could be added, but its definitely a deeper issue |
|
![]() Re: [0.4.6] Version 85f6023a
by
TarquinTheDark
@
7/02/2020 8:21 pm
17 sacks. You broke the game. GJ! :)
|
|
![]() Re: [0.4.6] Version 85f6023a
by
setherick
@
7/02/2020 8:30 pm
TarquinTheDark wrote: 17 sacks. You broke the game. GJ! :) Amateur. You allowed -64 passing yards. :)
Last edited 7/03/2020 1:30 am
|
|
![]() Re: [0.4.6] Version 85f6023a
by
TarquinTheDark
@
7/02/2020 9:02 pm
setherick wrote: TarquinTheDark wrote: 17 sacks. You broke the game. GJ! :) Amateur. You allowed -64 passing yards. :) He'll get better at it before it gets fixed. :) |
|
![]() Re: [0.4.6] Version 85f6023a
by
raymattison21
@
7/05/2020 9:11 am
13 sacks 5 ints last game. This opponent runs well and did ok but passing is stiffled. Overall, the last two games have averaged poorly on all three downs
Times Used/Avg: 114/0.2 1st Down/Avg: 46/-0.1 2nd Down/Avg: 39/1 3rd Down/Avg: 29/-0.5 |