Should be a good one!

GG Dave/Chargers, turnovers, penalties, and the two 4th down plays that did not succeed were the difference in that one. Terrible start down 9-0 had me expecting a bad sim, but it evened out.
Passing was brutal, we should have ran the ball more, but thats Bleeding Beta. Felt like there was a 50/50 chance for a pick every time Cooper dropped back, and higher % for an incomplete.

Dallas pulled off the undefeated season and repeat LC, not easy to do in Bleeding Beta.

Congrats GDB

GG
whoops! Not sure what happened to make me go pass happy. Especially after being up early.
You've got a great defense there in Dallas!

Congrats boss.

10 unowned teams now, most Ive ever seen in MFN 1. Not a good sign.

It happens more than you think and most elite owners never stay for a prolonged time. Without any code changes this is how it is. Even with but without any administration adding content or extra flavor the other leagues with the bleeding engine are more fun to me. You have livened up the forums here but any posting initiative is mostly limited to a lopsided trade related to collusion.

Not always collusion, there's also taking advantage of either a non-involved owner or noobie. The trade meter's variance is the primary culprit, where value is not decreased by factors like players age and position relevance. I would like to see JDB adjust the Ai weights. Theres a huge difference between a 2000 rated WR and a 2000 rated OL or DL, ito game impact. A 60 rater DL with 70+ speed and strength can lead their league in sacks, it happens a lot. Which is why I wouldnt trade what it would take to get a 90 rater DL that was 2000+ on the trade meter, or use a first round pick on one. Secondary, Linebackers, and WRs are the 3 most valuable position groups, and I think that should be reflected in the trade values. Any improvement to the trade meter values would be more than welcomed.