jdavidbakr wrote:
martinwarnett wrote:
Yeah, agree, it's definitely changed from grouping by stat area.
Just don't know the rationale for changing it - grouping as previous made perfect sense. Keep rushing stats together, passing stats together etc.
A change to say add headers to separate them (ie "Rushing" followed by rushing stats then "Passing" etc ) would break things up a bit, just not sure why went to alphabetical.
Just don't know the rationale for changing it - grouping as previous made perfect sense. Keep rushing stats together, passing stats together etc.
A change to say add headers to separate them (ie "Rushing" followed by rushing stats then "Passing" etc ) would break things up a bit, just not sure why went to alphabetical.
I didn't intentionally change the sort, but it was the first time I have this code split between beta and non-beta so possibly something broke the sort with that logic.
As another poster mentioned, it's just the sorting. Data seems fine.
