Welcome to the new Beta version of the MyFootballNow website! Please note that while using the Beta website, some features may not work correctly and other features are not complete. Some elements, such as notifications and chat, may act strangely during the time that both versions of the site are available. If you need to return to the old version, click on the button below.
Return to old website
People who liked this post
Firefly
Some bugs
by Firefly @ 10/16/2014 11:39 am
In the JAX game there were two very bad bugs. One was a safety for holding in the endzone in which no offensive player but the QB and RB were in the endzone. The other was a two-point conversion in which the defense elected not to take the field. Yup.
jdavidbakr
Re: Some bugs
by jdavidbakr (Site Admin) @ 10/16/2014 3:28 pm
Firefly wrote:
In the JAX game there were two very bad bugs. One was a safety for holding in the endzone in which no offensive player but the QB and RB were in the endzone. The other was a two-point conversion in which the defense elected not to take the field. Yup.

Holding in the end zone is if the player with the ball is in the end zone, not necessarily the hold itself.

For the 2-point conversion ... that is interesting...
jdavidbakr
Re: Some bugs
by jdavidbakr (Site Admin) @ 10/16/2014 3:29 pm
... I like how the RB still ran the sweep even though there was no defense.
RLWJR
Re: Some bugs
by RLWJR @ 10/16/2014 5:20 pm
Hey, I coach them up....... I've drilled into that kids head, time and time again, to run the play as designed...... Apparently he "gets it" now.......
Firefly
Re: Some bugs
by Firefly @ 10/16/2014 5:59 pm
jdavidbakr wrote:
Firefly wrote:
In the JAX game there were two very bad bugs. One was a safety for holding in the endzone in which no offensive player but the QB and RB were in the endzone. The other was a two-point conversion in which the defense elected not to take the field. Yup.

Holding in the end zone is if the player with the ball is in the end zone, not necessarily the hold itself.

For the 2-point conversion ... that is interesting...

I don't think so... are you sure about that?
jdavidbakr
Re: Some bugs
by jdavidbakr (Site Admin) @ 10/16/2014 7:25 pm
Firefly wrote:
I don't think so... are you sure about that?

Darn you, you have me pouring over the NFL rulebook now. I was looking for evidence to back that up but I'm realizing that I may have incorrectly interpreted the "spot of the foul" as being the spot of the ball at the foul, but that's not what it says, it does say the "spot of the foul" -
Firefly
Re: Some bugs
by Firefly @ 10/16/2014 8:59 pm
:D
jdavidbakr
Re: Some bugs
by jdavidbakr (Site Admin) @ 10/17/2014 8:38 am
I just pushed a change to MFN-1 for the holding penalties - let me know if you see anything wacky on holding calls. I don't expect any issues but the logic is slightly more complicated.