NOTICE: This league is using the BLEEDING EDGE game engine. For more information, click here.

League Forums

Main - League News/General Discussion

2022 Draft

By Tecra031
4/09/2015 8:38 am
Was looking over the draft class and noticed it looks incredibly weak again. Only 10 players
(not including the **** super kickers in every draft) rated 80+ future, and of those only 2 are 90+. I understand the whole development and boom/bust principles, but in a typical NFL draft, at least the top 10 are considered to studs and the rest of RD 1 are still top talent. In the draft, assuming the 80+ go 1-10, then 22 1st RD picks will be players rated 70s and possibly 60s. Doesn't make much sense.

While I am not saying to generate a ton of 90+ players, but there should be at least 5-10 90+ players (reflecting top 5-10 talent) and considerably more 80+ to fill the 1st RD at least. The drafts are continually weak, therefore creating the ridiculous feeding frenzy at free agency with crazy contracts for old players.

Just my 2 cents.

Re: 2022 Draft

By Thor
4/09/2015 8:54 am
I feel the same way.

Hopefully the changes that have been made to the new game engine will address some of this, but I'm not holding my breath.

Re: 2022 Draft

By Sardean
4/09/2015 9:23 am
is it possible for a 60 rated player in the draft to become a 90 rated player in his career?

I ask this because russell wilson and richard sherman have surely done this in real life.

GO HAWKS :)

Re: 2022 Draft

By Tecra031
4/09/2015 9:35 am
Yes it is, but it is rare.

Re: 2022 Draft

By jdavidbakr - Site Admin
4/09/2015 10:00 am
Sardean wrote:
is it possible for a 60 rated player in the draft to become a 90 rated player in his career?

I ask this because russell wilson and richard sherman have surely done this in real life.

GO HAWKS :)


Here's my poster child player for that:

http://mfn2.myfootballnow.com/player/2846

Also read http://blog.myfootballnow.com/2014/06/creepers-and-busts-dont-throw-away-your.html

I'm going to play with the standard deviation a bit and see what happens.

Re: 2022 Draft

By Sardean
4/09/2015 10:07 am
I'm going to play with the standard deviation a bit and see what happens.


yeah i think washington is a prime example where the coaches and especially the owner should massively enhance a players ability.

are any hints to possible deviations available by looking at the different attributes closely or is it a bit of luck and coaching?
Last edited at 4/09/2015 10:54 am

Re: 2022 Draft

By Mr.Krazy
4/09/2015 2:04 pm
I took a look at the Draft class, wasn't too shocked until I searched for cornerback... there is a scarce amount of corners in this draft, when really DT and CB positions in real life have the most depth in drafts. Plus there is only 1 CB with a future rating of 75+.

I think that in the next draft, there needs to be more of an abundance of Cornerbacks.

Just my 2 cents (literally, I have 2 cents)

Re: 2022 Draft

By Gustoon
4/09/2015 2:31 pm
Outside of the late 3rd round, I'm really not a fan of these 7 rounders.

Re: 2022 Draft

By Cork55
4/09/2015 8:04 pm
Tecra031 wrote:
Was looking over the draft class and noticed it looks incredibly weak again. Only 10 players
(not including the **** super kickers in every draft) rated 80+ future, and of those only 2 are 90+. I understand the whole development and boom/bust principles, but in a typical NFL draft, at least the top 10 are considered to studs and the rest of RD 1 are still top talent. In the draft, assuming the 80+ go 1-10, then 22 1st RD picks will be players rated 70s and possibly 60s. Doesn't make much sense.

While I am not saying to generate a ton of 90+ players, but there should be at least 5-10 90+ players (reflecting top 5-10 talent) and considerably more 80+ to fill the 1st RD at least. The drafts are continually weak, therefore creating the ridiculous feeding frenzy at free agency with crazy contracts for old players.

Just my 2 cents.


Well said.