Team won the championship the season before. Made it all the way back only to go nuclear, words cannot describe the ridiculousness of this epic meltdown from the very start of the game.

https://cust21.myfootballnow.com/gamecenter/view/2664#497154

i have to contribute that meltdown to your QB

Donald Paulz was 52-23 for 313 yds , 6 sacks for 41 yds , 2 touchdowns , long of 28 , 7 INTS and a passer rating of 37.26 = https://cust21.myfootballnow.com/box/view/2664

Donald Paulz = https://cust21.myfootballnow.com/player/5025

Remember your QB you had when you won was James Mitchell

james mitchell was 39-18 for 194 yds , 6 sacks for 42 yds , 2 touchdowns , long of 23 , 3 INTS and a passer rating of 46.31 = https://cust21.myfootballnow.com/box/view/2331

James Mitchell = https://cust21.myfootballnow.com/player/494

Only thing i can gather is Mitchell is longer in the tooth where he has the experience to where he doesnt play like Pautx did.

also maybe when the lights got the brightest Mitchell was at his best awhile Pautx let it effect him.

Kind of like Mitchell was like terry bradshaw , joe montana , Tom Brady , Joe Namath , etc. when he was on the highest stage
Awhile Pautx was like Neil O'Donnell , Scott Mitchell , Ryan Leaf , Rick Mirer , Tim Couch , etc. when he was on the highest stage

This is going a long way to support my Scramble may be more important than Accuracy suspicions (and mathematical reasoning).

Conference championship in my favorite league going against the team that had knocked me out of the playoffs four years straight. I had the ball with less than 2 minutes and a 9 point lead.

https://cust10.myfootballnow.com/gamecenter/view/2663#518552

This one sucked.

Mitchell is in all 3 meaningfull Ratings (acc/FOV/Scrambling) way better then Paulz...just look up his careerstats: almost 10% better completion percentage an more Yards per att.

7 INTS (2 Pick-Six) would kill any team