NOTICE: This league is using the BLEEDING EDGE game engine. For more information, click here.

The new user interface is in preview!

Want to check it out? Click here! (If you don't like it, you can still switch back)

League Forums

Main - General MFN Discussion

Re: QBs don't need Accuracy

By Gustoon
2/25/2017 5:18 pm
setherick wrote:
This just in: 28 accuracy QB (he's improved) throws 9 TDs in 100 point blow out win: https://cust78.myfootballnow.com/box/view/233

Through 11 games, he still doesn't complete 50%, but his TD:INT ratio is 40:14. I bet all y'all with 100 accuracy QBs would love that ratio. (I know I would.)


QB should be the most important piece in the teams jigsaw, and they're not really relevant at all, no one knows exactly what DNA makes a good QB here

Re: QBs don't need Accuracy

By WarEagle
2/25/2017 5:23 pm
Gustoon wrote:

QB should be the most important piece in the teams jigsaw, and they're not really relevant at all, no one knows exactly what DNA makes a good QB here


I don't think there is such as thing as a "good QB" in MFN. They are basically all the same when you watch a game. The only difference is the random combination of "dice rolls" on each play, which can make a poorly rated QB perform better than a highly rated QB, and vice versa.

In short, it's mostly just randomness like everything else (except blitzing the **** out of your opponent to shut down the running game - that works without fail).

Re: QBs don't need Accuracy

By Jake-Attack03
2/25/2017 5:29 pm
This should be tweaked with, to make the QB's outcome, or result, less random; and more based on his Abilities and ratings.

Re: QBs don't need Accuracy

By parsh
2/25/2017 5:41 pm
parsh wrote:
Back on point .. I agree with the OP:

4 games in .. 44 Accuracy:
(9 games in) .. still 44 Accuracy:

Att 179 (341)
Comp 95 (177)
Pct 53.1 (51.9)
Yds 1,537 (2961)
Yds/Att 8.59 (8.68)
Sk/Yd 14/101 (32/228)
TDs 12 (22)
Int 3 (8)
Lng 80 (88)
Rat 97.45 (93.25)

https://cust10.myfootballnow.com/player/4836


(Currently at midweek 10) added to my post .. and still agree with the OP .. lol