WarEagle wrote:
parsh wrote:
jdavidbakr wrote:
I've actually mulled the idea of having a league type where you only build your roster (no game planning), I hadn't thought of having one without trades.
In either case I wouldn't change any existing leagues, they would be new leagues with those settings.
Id love a GM based league. I don't want any coaching responsibilities at all. Not my thing. Sadly, as it stands now thats the way to way to win a league.
Custom league of course ... lol. Appreciate your taking this suggestion!
Not me, at least not with the current AI.
Can you imagine how horrible the games/teams would be with the AI making all the decisions about the depth chart, selected plays from the playbooks, when to sit/start a player due to injury, etc.
It would be a constant game of 3TE/3RB sets, since those seem to be the only plays the AI recommends you select in your playbook.
Not to mention burying a 50 rated QB in the depth chart instead of switching his position to WR where he is rated at 85, playing your star RB in a meaningless week 16 game even though he is questionable with a leg injury, punting on 4th and 1 from the 50 when you're down by 6 with 1:15 to go, etc., etc.
@WarEagle
2 things
1 = with that attitude you aren't going anywhere fast in your life.
2 = You have to imagine if JDB did decide to make a league with he visions what he would want to do where we don't game plan he would probably work as twice as hard to make sure those things that you said don't happen because the whole part of him thinking of those ideas and making leagues like that would probably not last long or no one would be in them if those things did rear their ugly head.
raymattison21 wrote:
jdavidbakr wrote:
I've actually mulled the idea of having a league type where you only build your roster (no game planning), I hadn't thought of having one without trades.
In either case I wouldn't change any existing leagues, they would be new leagues with those settings.
So far off but, leagues where different users are owners who hire other users as GMs and also could hire other users as coaches. Having 3 or 4 users on a team. Some users could pick up label as this or that as thier area of specialty.
All is a fake money based thing, where as users win games they get money to invest in buying new teams. Or just have users pay real money to buy teams and hire other established users. It could get crazy, with the hiring and firing of users. A new user might have to start as say an offensive coordinator of something like that.
I think I tried a college game where the whole thing was designed that way, but I stayed one or two days.
I am guessing you were trying this game =
http://cfbhc.com/index.php?/page/index.htmlUnless it was this game that you were referring to =
http://www.pigskinempire.com/login.aspxThough I do like the idea where Users could team up on a team in a league on this website if that was your idea .
That way Bryson or at least I think that's the one that always said he learned things from setherick could be on the same team as setherick .
Heck even Roll Tide and War Eagle could be on the same team which would make things very interesting.
Do have to say you could have interesting pairs of users on the same team.
Only problem I can see happening is a team loses games or make bad plays who would get the blame like would that be War eagle or Roll tide if they were working together and if Bryson and setherick were working together does that mean setherick gets the blame or would that mean Bryson get it.
