NOTICE: This league is using the BLEEDING EDGE game engine. For more information, click here.

The new user interface is in preview!

Want to check it out? Click here! (If you don't like it, you can still switch back)

The draft is underway!

Click here to go to your war room, or visit the war room item in the draft menu.

League Forums

Main - General MFN Discussion

Re: Draft suggestion

By Gustoon
2/20/2015 1:57 pm
Yeah, in 2 mins I can't get past page 4 and even that is faster than I'd like

Re: Draft suggestion

By WarEagle
2/20/2015 2:08 pm
To avoid this issue, as soon as the results load, I download them.

Most of the time I can get the download before it freezes up again.

I can then review the results at my leisure.

Then I just have to struggle to get any new players on my draft board in the order I want.

Re: Draft suggestion

By Gustoon
2/20/2015 2:12 pm
WarEagle wrote:
To avoid this issue, as soon as the results load, I download them.

Most of the time I can get the download before it freezes up again.

I can then review the results at my leisure.

Then I just have to struggle to get any new players on my draft board in the order I want.


I do the same thing.

Re: Draft suggestion

By WarEagle
2/20/2015 2:26 pm
Ha!

Re: Draft suggestion

By ibblacklavender02
3/14/2015 2:34 am
It seems all players are 22 years old in the draft. I'd like some age variation from Brandon Weeden to the rare Amobi Okoye.

Re: Draft suggestion

By WarEagle
6/05/2015 6:22 am
I have another suggestion.

It would be great if we could tell the AI to evaluate players based on potential ratings rather than current ratings.

I'd rather take a 50/80 2nd year player, but the AI wants to select a 65/65 11 year vet, for example.

jdavidbakr wrote:
Yes, I need to give a slider for that. Right now I believe it's using the halfway point for the evaluation.


Just curious.

Any idea if/when this might be implemented?

Thanks
Last edited at 6/05/2015 6:23 am

Re: Draft suggestion

By jdavidbakr - Site Admin
6/05/2015 6:29 am
WarEagle wrote:
I have another suggestion.

It would be great if we could tell the AI to evaluate players based on potential ratings rather than current ratings.

I'd rather take a 50/80 2nd year player, but the AI wants to select a 65/65 11 year vet, for example.

jdavidbakr wrote:
Yes, I need to give a slider for that. Right now I believe it's using the halfway point for the evaluation.


Just curious.

Any idea if/when this might be implemented?

Thanks


It is near the top of the "up next" list.

Re: Draft suggestion

By mrfakename
6/05/2015 9:00 am
jdavidbakr wrote:
WarEagle wrote:
I have another suggestion.

It would be great if we could tell the AI to evaluate players based on potential ratings rather than current ratings.

I'd rather take a 50/80 2nd year player, but the AI wants to select a 65/65 11 year vet, for example.

jdavidbakr wrote:
Yes, I need to give a slider for that. Right now I believe it's using the halfway point for the evaluation.


Just curious.

Any idea if/when this might be implemented?

Thanks


It is near the top of the "up next" list.


I would rather see a slider with the current auto draft setting that enables you to desire a particular level of experience at each postion group. Like a 0-10 silder, zero being mostly young guys and 10 being the old vets. Of course, later on you can adjust the silders as your team starts to develop.

I dont want young or old guys. Most likely a nice blend highlighted by some core positions that depending on scheme\coaches, for me, might need experience while others positions in that scheme a young guy I may be able to get away with as they develop quickly under a proper mananged coaching staff that highlights that young players areas of maximum gain.

Being in Rnd 9 of my first allocation draft, and using the auto setting for half of that I did find my self scrolling down to find young players alot. But now I want to find some older vets for a saftey net that I know can play in my system as these big potenial guys are prone to not to living up to hype and could derail some of my current gameplans.

Having a slider at each position group would allow me to set a whole all. draft with more long term security. But really through the player postion wieghts I feel this can be simulated slightly by focusing on ahtletic ability and less on technique. As vets are well formed there but may have lost some strength or a step. I used some different player weights and found younger guys moved up the board due to the way I wieghed the position ratings.