New Sticky Note

NOTICE: This league is using the BLEEDING EDGE game engine. For more information, click here.

The new user interface is in preview!

Want to check it out? Click here! (If you don't like it, you can still switch back)

League Forums

Main - Bug Box

Re: Team hasn't clinched?

By Gustoon
6/27/2015 2:10 am
parsh wrote:
O-H-I-O was showing in Wk 15 as having earned a playoff berth .. yet they are now eliminated because Philly in playing in the Wildcard round.

My point was had that been me, and I rested my starters. Then learning my team was out of the playoffs ... it would be the last day I logged in.


How does this happen, I'm eliminated but OHIO, who are below us aren't?? We also beat OHIO twice in reg season, seems a bit odd??


Division 7 W L T Pct PF PA Div Conf Streak Owner
Philadelphia 9 7 0 0.562 392 447 4-2 8-4 1W count_joshoo
e-New York Mohawks 9 7 0 0.562 273 329 4-2 7-5 1W Gustoon
O-H-I-O Nomads 9 7 0 0.562 435 379 4-2 7-5 1L rayrich026
e-San Jose 3 13 0 0.188 319 470 0-6 1-11 11L Bhavan_Patel
Last edited at 6/27/2015 2:12 am

Re: Team hasn't clinched?

By Sardean
6/27/2015 2:33 am
Gustoon wrote:
parsh wrote:
O-H-I-O was showing in Wk 15 as having earned a playoff berth .. yet they are now eliminated because Philly in playing in the Wildcard round.

My point was had that been me, and I rested my starters. Then learning my team was out of the playoffs ... it would be the last day I logged in.


How does this happen, I'm eliminated but OHIO, who are below us aren't?? We also beat OHIO twice in reg season, seems a bit odd??


Division 7 W L T Pct PF PA Div Conf Streak Owner
Philadelphia 9 7 0 0.562 392 447 4-2 8-4 1W count_joshoo
e-New York Mohawks 9 7 0 0.562 273 329 4-2 7-5 1W Gustoon
O-H-I-O Nomads 9 7 0 0.562 435 379 4-2 7-5 1L rayrich026
e-San Jose 3 13 0 0.188 319 470 0-6 1-11 11L Bhavan_Patel


I think there is a clause that in the event of a draw teh team with the least amount of punters used wins. Being that O-H-I-O used 1 and you used 53, you LOST!

Re: Team hasn't clinched?

By Gustoon
6/27/2015 5:57 am
But we didn't punt once, whuch means that we won without ever taking the field, thats some Ws there

Re: Team hasn't clinched?

By Sardean
6/27/2015 7:12 am
my head is wheeling at that, i mean reeling.

Re: Team hasn't clinched?

By Gustoon
6/27/2015 8:39 am
Sardean wrote:
my head is wheeling at that, i mean reeling.

Team hasn't clinched, but I have ha ha.

Re: Team hasn't clinched?

By Ares
8/01/2015 5:48 pm
http://cust10.myfootballnow.com/

Detroit in Div-7 doesn't show as either clinched or eliminated, yet every other team in the conference shows as either one or the other. The only other team that could tie their season record pending the outcome of the next game is El Paso, but they show as e-. It may also be because two other teams currently show as x- since their division isn't yet settled?

Re: Team hasn't clinched?

By Morbid
8/01/2015 6:58 pm
It def should have been H2H as first tie breaker, then division record then conference record

Re: Team hasn't clinched?

By jdavidbakr - Site Admin
8/03/2015 8:38 am
If the calculations get too complicated the clinching algorithm errs on the side of not assigning anything.

Re: Team hasn't clinched?

By jsid
8/03/2015 10:42 am
Ares wrote:
http://cust10.myfootballnow.com/

Detroit in Div-7 doesn't show as either clinched or eliminated, yet every other team in the conference shows as either one or the other. The only other team that could tie their season record pending the outcome of the next game is El Paso, but they show as e-. It may also be because two other teams currently show as x- since their division isn't yet settled?



Yeah, does ELP have a chance here? I don't understand why I don't get the tiebreaker if I win tonight and Detroit loses. Right now I have my "Injury Prevention and Get Everyone Some Reps" Gameplan in, but I might have to switch it out.

Re: Team hasn't clinched?

By jdavidbakr - Site Admin
8/03/2015 11:09 am
I believe Detroit has clinched, unless I missed something in my hand-checking. The tiebreaker is common opponents, Detroit is 4-1 and El Paso is 3-3, and your last game is a common opponent. If Detroit loses and El Passo wins, your common opponents will be 4-2 vs 4-3, so 4-2 is a better winning percentage than 4-3.

I'm not sure why the clinching logic didn't award it to Detroit but the elimination logic appears to have it correct.