If you wish to vote for a combination of options, please vote for the one that you want most and add a comment to the thread. If there is a popular alternative option I will make a new poll.

I would be alright with only obfuscating volatility along with making rookie camp more significant. Looking at the NFL, I think you see much more first and secound round talent actually get playing time and involved in there careers than what the current system allows. Not to say that every player should do that, as there are obviously players who need time to further develop before making an impact on the field.

I would also be in favor of obfuscating only volatility.

I believe the obfuscation, in its current state, in simply too random. I'm not sure if adding more scouts would be the answer.

- Keep statics visible (because those tend to be relatively easy measurables, even in the NFL)
- Obfuscate Volatility (because in the NFL, you never really know whether a guy's going to boom or bust, just a vague idea)
- Make Rookies' Camp movement more significant (because teams tend to find out a better picture of boom / bust in Camp)
- Some more available scouts... I'm torn whether they should be public or private, though. I'd like it to be where the team scouting gets a better report than the public report, but I'm not sure how that would be to code.

Obfuscate only volatility.

I think that's what I selected. Not sure though because it only has 1 vote and sounds like someone else also voted for it already.

It would also be good to make rookie camp more significant.

Can I vote for two - better rookie camps and obfuscating everything but static attributes.

Volatility doesn't tell you if a player will boom or bust.

The likelihood of boom / bust then...

Whoops.