NOTICE: This league is using the BLEEDING EDGE game engine. For more information, click here.

The new user interface is in preview!

Want to check it out? Click here! (If you don't like it, you can still switch back)

League Forums

Main - League News/General Discussion

2016 Week 6

By jdavidbakr - Site Admin
2/21/2014 7:54 am
GG to the Dallas AI. And just like that, the AC West is all knotted up with 3 teams in first place at 3-3.

Re: 2016 Week 6

By Firefly
2/21/2014 1:03 pm
Dulaney was hard to stop until he started throwing interceptions. 5 of them!

GG Titans

Re: 2016 Week 6

By chinaski
2/21/2014 1:36 pm
Stole one vs the Giants. GG.

Sidenote, really wish I could figure out how to get more targets on my #1 WR ****. Just cant do it, he rarely gets more than 3 thrown at him a game (or at least it sure feels like it) I want to thow at him 50% of the time, not 5%.

Re: 2016 Week 6

By jdavidbakr - Site Admin
2/21/2014 2:24 pm
chinaski wrote:
Sidenote, really wish I could figure out how to get more targets on my #1 WR ****. Just cant do it, he rarely gets more than 3 thrown at him a game (or at least it sure feels like it) I want to thow at him 50% of the time, not 5%.


I agree, and it is most definitely on the road map.

Re: 2016 Week 6

By chinaski
2/21/2014 2:26 pm
Is this a bug? He plays just about every snap from what I can see. My 2,3,4,RB and TE all get targeted pretty consistently.

Re: 2016 Week 6

By jdavidbakr - Site Admin
2/21/2014 4:23 pm
chinaski wrote:
Is this a bug? He plays just about every snap from what I can see. My 2,3,4,RB and TE all get targeted pretty consistently.


It has to do with the logic that the QB uses to decide the target. Right now, the read progression is set based on the length of the routes vs. the play type, and as the QB goes through his progressions he will throw to a more open receiver in his view if one is available. (Actually, there is a weight given to each receiver in his view with a higher randomness if the QB has a lower experience value). What I think is happening is that the WR's are covered significantly more than the TE's and RB's and so they are getting more of the targets. Also, I think the #1 WR might be running deeper routes in general than the play type calls for, which is lowering them on the read progression in the first place.

Definitely something that's going to require a bit of study on my part to come up with the best solution - whether that's assigning a default read progression for each play, making the read progression AI more intelligent, forcing the #1 WR to be the #1 read more often, giving you more control over the read progression, or something else.

Re: 2016 Week 6

By Cork55
2/21/2014 8:55 pm
gg Wolfpack. We fought hard, but the pick in OT doomed us.

Re: 2016 Week 6

By Wolfpack
2/23/2014 11:03 pm
Cork55 wrote:
gg Wolfpack. We fought hard, but the pick in OT doomed us.


GG too. That was a messy one for sure.