4) QBs are NOT throwing away the ball nor trying to run from a sack. They are glued to the pocket.
3)a) 43 man coverage should be a liability . I play with some bad cover lbs in 87 and my 60 man cover guy gets beat all the time where my 14 man cover does that all the time. It could look better...maybe not sooooo hard.
Does he only have 43? To be honest, I didn't double check who was covering on that play. Then, yes, should be a liability. But he should at least remember who his man is right? This isn't pop warner. ;)
After running a few seasons with the current code in testing the interceptions still seem too high; I'm going to reduce the interception attempt probability and hopefully convert some of those interceptions to knockdowns instead.
After running a few seasons with the current code in testing the interceptions still seem too high; I'm going to reduce the interception attempt probability and hopefully convert some of those interceptions to knockdowns instead.
Was going to post about crossing routes again today, but have not had time. These are especially vulnerable to INTs even with the "I didn't see the CB" code removed.
I haven't watched much film yet, but just scanning through stats and some of the game logs, and games look better statistically. I probably won't have time to break down much game film this weekend, so I'm curious to what other are seeing in their games.
I did notice this good example play of a WR breaking down a DB at the line and then the QB putting the ball far enough out in front the WR could run under it: https://mfn1.myfootballnow.com/watch/7897#1427292
I don't know how comfortable you guys are with horrible man coverage getting really confused . #46 with 16?man coverage just ignoring the RB.
Re: Beta update release
by
raymattison21
@
3/29/2018 1:13 pm
Just to note a few other man to man oddities . If a back stays in to block his cover guy should do something , and that last second give up on coverage on fly/flag patterns happens a few times a game
Re: Beta update release
by
setherick
@
3/29/2018 1:27 pm
raymattison21 wrote:
https://mfn1.myfootballnow.com/watch/7888#1425720
I don't know how comfortable you guys are with horrible man coverage getting really confused . #46 with 16?man coverage just ignoring the RB.
Why the **** do you have a DB with <20 M2M? :)
That play is really strange. I'm trying to figure out what exactly happened, but I guess it's not outside the possibility that a defender with that low M2M completely blows an assignment before the play starts. It's like the SS doesn't know whether to cover the HB or the FB that is blocking.
raymattison21 wrote:
Just to note a few other man to man oddities . If a back stays in to block his cover guy should do something , and that last second give up on coverage on fly/flag patterns happens a few times a game
Can you find examples of this? The examples I've see is when my 100 M2M, 60 SP CB is covering a much faster WR with good Route skills. Eventually, the WR wins one of the M2M vs Route rolls and slips behind the CB. To me this makes a lot of sense, so I'm curious if you're seeing plays where the WR and CB are equally matched.
Last edited 3/29/2018 5:30 pm
Re: Beta update release
by
raymattison21
@
3/29/2018 3:58 pm
setherick wrote:
raymattison21 wrote:
https://mfn1.myfootballnow.com/watch/7888#1425720
I don't know how comfortable you guys are with horrible man coverage getting really confused . #46 with 16?man coverage just ignoring the RB.
Why the **** do you have a DB with <20 M2M? :)
That play is really strange. I'm trying to figure out what exactly happened, but I guess it's not outside the possibility that a defender with that low M2M completely blows an assignment before the play starts. It's like the SS doesn't know whether to cover the HB or the FB that is blocking.
raymattison21 wrote:
Just to note a few other man to man oddities . If a back stays in to block his cover guy should do something , and that last second give up on coverage on fly/flag patterns happens a few times a game
Can you find examples of this? The examples I've see is when my 100 M2M, 60 SP CB is covering a much faster WR with good Route skills. Eventually, the WR wins one of the M2M vs Route rolls and slips behind the CB. To me this makes a lot of sense, so I'm curious if you're seeing plays where the WR and CB are equally matched.
