Pernbronze wrote:
greyghost1225 wrote:
If the rules would change by some sort of act from god, the question MFN has to ask "Will more serious individuals join the game to replace the few that leave due to the rule change"
The answer to that is a resounding nope. They don't bring in many new players in the first place and those that do come in are wanting control and desire to actively improve or change teams to their own style. Restricting this would also make it less desirable to take on a failing team and rebuild it which is what is likely going on here though I've had that result by simply trading back when I don't need any new players from a draft as well. This is simply a more extreme version of what the Raiders are attempting under Gruden. Like I said this will limit attractiveness to new owners but more importantly keep people from wanting to rebuild creating dead leagues and players quitting when their roster gets too old and face not being able to restock fast enough to be competitive. The rule proposal does significant harm while having no benefit besides haha you can't use that strategy to make your team competitive anymore.
Most of this is dribble, but if you are using my idea, thinking that this is support of my building strategy you are mistaken. I have built many times through the draft, free agency, waiver claims, and trades and any owner will tell you that. I will still to my original post which hold facts. I don't find it necessary to make any personal attacks on your building strategy, even though it falls in the minority of league owners.
