This play shows some good clock measured speed. The WR ran a sub 5 second fourty.....from a running start . Close if not 4.5 speed. The 44 speed SS chasing him ran a 6 plus. So, not only a players weight will really slow a player, but a pretty low speed score will too.
This play shows some good clock measured speed. The WR ran a sub 5 second fourty.....from a running start . Close if not 4.5 speed. The 44 speed SS chasing him ran a 6 plus. So, not only a players weight will really slow a player, but a pretty low speed score will too.
Low speed means slower player? Go figure. The problem is no safety should run a 6+ 40 time.
This play shows some good clock measured speed. The WR ran a sub 5 second fourty.....from a running start . Close if not 4.5 speed. The 44 speed SS chasing him ran a 6 plus. So, not only a players weight will really slow a player, but a pretty low speed score will too.
Low speed means slower player? Go figure. The problem is no safety should run a 6+ 40 time.
This was on a pass, but if i put a 44 speed db on kick off would his speed line up similar? But yes the point is both are probably slow based off this test, and what you have observed
Is coverage on slant routes fixed? I'm getting tired of almost losing playoff games because my opponent completes 4 slant passes despite getting shutdown the rest of the game: https://mfn19.myfootballnow.com/box/7987
Dbs are just running around Tackles. Same like years ago. Same like punt blocks same like wrs at running back all tied to the penalty applied for a players weight in pounds and our player in game 40 times.
Is coverage on slant routes fixed? I'm getting tired of almost losing playoff games because my opponent completes 4 slant passes despite getting shutdown the rest of the game: https://mfn19.myfootballnow.com/box/7987
For me, the bigger issue is all but four passes are so easy to shut down.
