raymattison21 wrote:
To be honest 3 times as low is alot. Game changing.
Also the reasons make no sense. He has weapons that's it. In the nfl scrambling qb actually get sacked more often . ...I am not falling for this. Ends were nerfed and DTS are overpowered.
It is too easy to blitz and cover sack while one on one blocking is way down.
You're missing the bigger point. 2 of the 3 sacks game in the past two games after JDB changed the blocking code again. In the first five games of the season, my team gave up a ridiculously low number of sacks too because I have a strong pass blocking OL, fast QB, and throw short passes. In the past two games, my team gave up 1 sack when my fast QB was playing and 4 when my slower QB was playing. You need to give the code change at least two more games to get a decent statistical reading of code change.
A very quick look at the players that are allowing the most sacks have terrible, terrible pass blocking attributes. And a good number of them play inside. Once more players start moving their slow, good pass blocking OL inside, and get rid of the default strong run blocking but bad pass blocking guards, inside sack numbers will fall. (Like yours have.)
If there is a problem right now with pass blocking, it's that physical weight isn't being factored correctly. My tackles are 250# and 265#, and they dominate all DEs.
EDIT
Wanted to add a few more things to this. I don't mind most of the sack leaders being LBs coming on a blitz. This is on par with the NFL right now where 7 of the top 10 sack leaders are LBs:
http://www.espn.com/nfl/statistics/player/_/stat/defense/sort/sacks/year/2016/seasontype/2The other thing I wanted to add is that I want to see if inside sack numbers drop now that the OL is holding their blocks better and not being pushed immediately backward by the interior of the DL.
Last edited at 1/04/2017 8:30 am