New Sticky Note

NOTICE: This league is using the BLEEDING EDGE game engine. For more information, click here.

League Forums

Main - Beta Chat

Re: [0.4.6] Version 09d60821

By raymattison21
9/02/2020 6:25 am
https://mfn1.myfootballnow.com/watch/11900#2219074



Offensive Play: Shotgun 2 RB 3 WR FB In
Defensive Play: 3-4 Normal Man Cover 1 - Pass

I think this is the set of two plays most responsible

Last edited at 9/02/2020 6:26 am

Re: [0.4.6] Version 09d60821

By raymattison21
9/02/2020 6:31 am
https://mfn1.myfootballnow.com/watch/11900#2219079

ive Play: Shotgun Normal Deep Weak In and Out
Defensive Play: 3-4 Normal Double WR2 - Pass



Re: [0.4.6] Version 09d60821

By raymattison21
9/03/2020 6:13 am
10 ints and 5 sacks total in the 6 playoff games in Victory. The worst of the stats if this is released.

Re: [0.4.6] Version 09d60821

By Infinity on Trial
9/03/2020 8:40 am
I recorded two sacks from the 4-3 Normal Double WR1 defense, both against long passes.

https://mfn1.myfootballnow.com/watch/11901#2219090
Weak I Normal All Go

https://mfn1.myfootballnow.com/watch/11901#2219214
I Formation Normal PA Streaks

Both plays involve a LT with 77 speed, 66 acceleration, 77 strength and 81 pass blocking who "missed that block completely" against an RDE with 74/68/69/82 in comparison (and lacks position experience).

On both plays, it looks like QB is sacked about the time the WRs running streaks get 10 yards downfield.

No interceptions, but my opponent QB had a 51.35% completion rate and 3.49 yards per pass. I completed 70% but still had just 5.93 per pass. There were 17 knockdowns out of 64 passes.

Defensively, I didn't bother with rules and forgot to check the LB balance in the matrix. As a result, I unintentionally ran the 4-3 Normal Double WR1 a whopping 18 times, and saw virtually no penalty for it.

Overall on defense, I ran 27 plays with a 5-man rush and 22 plays with a four-man rush.

Re: [0.4.6] Version 09d60821

By jdavidbakr - Site Admin
9/03/2020 10:24 am
raymattison21 wrote:
https://mfn1.myfootballnow.com/watch/11900#2218917

#53 really should not be allowed to be untouched en route to the QB. The back helped on the LDE where he could have picked up the LB. The RG did have 35 speed and 43 acceleration, but had 100 pass block.


Only looked at this one so far but the RB's blitz pickup is weighted toward his intelligence, which he only is 47, so that is likely why he's not picking up the blitz here - his dice roll is not going to pick up the blitz like a high intelligence RB would.

Re: [0.4.6] Version 09d60821

By Infinity on Trial
9/04/2020 7:36 am
No sacks this week, but QBs produced just 3.94 and 4.58 yards per pass.

Out of 89 passes: 54 completed (60.7%), 22 knocked down, 4 intercepted (all thrown by my opponent ... a 5th was overturned by penalty).

The five interceptions involved five different offensive plays and five different defensive plays.

Excluding goal line plays, I used 5 rushers on 32 snaps and four rushers on 46 snaps. Still no rules or overrides in place.

Re: [0.4.6] Version 09d60821

By setherick
9/04/2020 7:41 am
Infinity on Trial wrote:
Out of 89 passes: 54 completed (60.7%), 22 knocked down, 4 intercepted (all thrown by my opponent ... a 5th was overturned by penalty).


On the bright side, who needs to pass when you'll be able to run for 300-400 yards per game? Am I right?

I'm sure the people that are hating the Alex Smith ball right now will love playing Lamar Jackson-Ravens power running as the only way to generate yards.
Last edited at 9/04/2020 7:44 am

Re: [0.4.6] Version 09d60821

By raymattison21
9/04/2020 10:28 am
36 ints and 6 total sacks for the league as a whole this week. I would much rather let the qbs run and get sacked than keep forcing these interceptions. I wonder how many ints/knockdowns are coming for off ball defenders in man?

Is there a way to have the qbs reposition the pocket and not have to go throught the read progression again. Perhaps that not how it works but there are too many open recievers missed due to play selection.

Or have them get outside the hashes and throw it away...as every throw away i see is a penalty.

or lower man coverage and lower lookoff or lower pass release...the qbs need to be throwing less ints and getting sacked more .....not just sacks on long passes.

Re: [0.4.6] Version 09d60821

By raymattison21
9/04/2020 10:29 am
setherick wrote:
Infinity on Trial wrote:
Out of 89 passes: 54 completed (60.7%), 22 knocked down, 4 intercepted (all thrown by my opponent ... a 5th was overturned by penalty).


On the bright side, who needs to pass when you'll be able to run for 300-400 yards per game? Am I right?

I'm sure the people that are hating the Alex Smith ball right now will love playing Lamar Jackson-Ravens power running as the only way to generate yards.


I think you can still blitz and stop the run..

Re: [0.4.6] Version 09d60821

By raymattison21
9/04/2020 10:31 am
Infinity on Trial wrote:
No sacks this week, but QBs produced just 3.94 and 4.58 yards per pass.

Out of 89 passes: 54 completed (60.7%), 22 knocked down, 4 intercepted (all thrown by my opponent ... a 5th was overturned by penalty).

The five interceptions involved five different offensive plays and five different defensive plays.

Excluding goal line plays, I used 5 rushers on 32 snaps and four rushers on 46 snaps. Still no rules or overrides in place.


A couple of those ints were vs. a two deep with man under....its a great pass defense... currently